Dear readers,
The response was huge! Since we officially
launched ROR two weeks ago, many people have already added a
ROR file to their site for describing its content and objects.
We want to thank you all for helping us spread the word about ROR
by adding our article
on your website. We did a search for the article on Google, and
already found over 300 references to it.
The Add Me Free Search Engine Submission is now ROR-enabled. This
means that if you have a ROR file on your site, the service can
read it and extract the necessary information from it, so you don't
need to retype it. And if you don't have a ROR file yet, you can
create one with the information entered in the submission form.
You can also create a ROR file with the ROR File Editor, or from
a template, at http://www.addme.com/ror-sitemap-generator.htm
Happy RORing! The Add
Me Team
Link Building for Hilltop
By Andy Hagans
Hilltop is one of the major concepts underpinning Google's search algorithm, yet
its workings and implications are often misunderstood. After the infamous
Florida Update, many webmasters were aghast as their rankings plummeted; and
again, when the mysterious "sandbox" was implemented, some webmasters could not
get a Web site to rank well, period.
Part of the reason that some Web sites get
shuffled out of the SERPs when new algorithmic features are implemented is that
those sites never gained authority in the eyes of the search engines?that is,
they were not sufficiently meshed into their local topical communities.
This concept of authority was one pioneered in a paper titled "Hilltop: A Search
Engine based on Expert Documents," written by Krishna Bharat and George A.
Mihaila. The full text is available online at
http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~georgem/hilltop/.
(Note: Google has obviously not implemented Hilltop in its pure form, but rather
uses the principles of topical communities and authority in its algorithm.
Likewise, other search engines such as MSN and Yahoo! are not using Hilltop per
se, but rather similar algorithmic features. Thus when I mention ?Hilltop' I am
referring to not just the specific paper published by Bharat and Mihaila, but
also to the fundamental theory upon which any authority-based link popularity
algorithm is based. This theory applies to Topic-Sensitive PageRank, etc.)
The Basics of Hilltop
Google's PageRank formula revolutionized search, but it has a major flaw: it
gives each page an absolute measure of importance. Recognizing that a page's
importance should be interpreted in light of a given query topic, the Hilltop
formula uses the link structure of the topical community related to the query
topic when determining relevance.
For a given topic query, some pages are considered to be "expert documents," and
others are "authorities." A page is an expert document if it "is about a certain
topic and has links to many non-affiliated pages on that topic" (this type of
page is also sometimes called a hub). A page is an authority "if and only if
some of the best experts on the query topic point to it." To summarize: hubs
link to authorities; authorities are linked to by hubs.
The Challenge for New Web Sites
The nature of the World Wide Web dictates that it will take time for a new Web
site to get links from within its topical community. Many hubs such as resource
lists or niche directories are only updated periodically with new links. Still
others are static pages that will never be changed.
Then there is the "human factor." It takes time for a Web site to be recognized
as valuable, and for webmasters to trust it enough to link to it. Older
authority sites and hubs also tend to link to other older authority sites,
creating a sort of self-perpetuating authority set (Mike Grehan refers to this
phenomenon in his article "Filthy Linking Rich,". This all adds up to
the fact that it is very hard to make a new Web site an authority in the eyes of
the search engine, which begs the question: How can a new Web site become
entrenched in its topical neighborhood more quickly?
Break Into Your Topical Neighborhood
To make your Web site an authority, you should first seek to obtain links from
topical hubs. Obvious hubs might include any niche directories or resource pages
about your Web site's topic.
One way to find less obvious hubs is to do a backlink search on authority sites
in your topical community. Finding authority sites is easy--they are the sites
that rank highly for a search for that topic. Once you find an authority, search
"link:http://www.theirsite.com." Go through the backlinks, and find pages that
link out to multiple sites within your topic; a page that links out to multiple
authority sites is probably considered a hub by a search engine.
Aside from hubs, it can be quite helpful to get links from the authority sites
themselves. I have seen many Web sites get a significant boost after obtaining
just one link from a top authority. It is implied that an authority site will
link out less than will a hub, and therefore it is possible that these links are
even more valuable in terms of rankings.
Obtaining links from quality hubs and authorities is easier said than done. One
can however use certain methods to get links quickly. These methods include but
are not limited to: offering to swap links; submitting a relevant, well-written
press release; submitting a relevant, well-written article with your Web site's
URL hyperlinked and embedded in the copy; offering to buy or rent a links; and,
of course, writing a lot of great content (it will get noticed, sooner or
later!).
Conclusion
Obtaining links from reputable sources within your Web site's topical community
is necessary in order for that site to be ranked highly in today's search engine
algorithms. Getting your Web site entrenched within its topical community would
be a good idea anyway, even if search engines did not exist--which is a pretty
good litmus test for a strong, long-term SEO method.
|